Most Reliable "GI"-type 1911s

All things 1911 and designs based on the 1911.
User avatar
Hand and Steel
Posts: 711
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2015 2:44 am
Location: In the world but not of it

Most Reliable "GI"-type 1911s

Postby Hand and Steel » Tue Dec 20, 2016 6:09 pm

Share your thoughts on which 1911 A1/WWII/GI type 1911s are most reliable, and explain your experience with them. Springfield Mil-Spec vs Colt "Series 70", etc.
"Our great war is a spiritual war, our great depression is our lives."

User avatar
Nathan
Site Admin
Posts: 1940
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2014 8:51 pm
Location: Billings, MT
Contact:

Re: Most Reliable "GI"-type 1911s

Postby Nathan » Tue Dec 20, 2016 6:32 pm

In my experience, mil-spec is mil-spec is mil-spec. Aside from the Colt name, there is no valid reason to buy a Colt mil-spec over a Springfield mil-spec. That said, if you're wanting an authentic mil-spec 1911, it gets no more authentic than Colt. Quality will be comparable.

Is this something that you intend to upgrade over time or will you leave it mil-spec?
Nathan in Image

NRA Certified Instructor in Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun, Personal Protection Inside the Home and Personal Protection Outside the Home.
Image

User avatar
Hand and Steel
Posts: 711
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2015 2:44 am
Location: In the world but not of it

Re: Most Reliable "GI"-type 1911s

Postby Hand and Steel » Tue Dec 20, 2016 10:52 pm

It would be left stock, except perhaps for grips or a mainspring housing without the lock in the case of a Springfield. Almost certainly in stainless.
"Our great war is a spiritual war, our great depression is our lives."

MisterB
Posts: 437
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2014 7:54 pm

Re: Most Reliable "GI"-type 1911s

Postby MisterB » Wed Dec 21, 2016 10:55 am

I have an Auto Ordnance WWII parkerized mil spec 1911 that I'm quite happy with. It really has the look and feel of an original WWII 1911. I added genuine WWII issue grips to complete the look. I know you said you wanted stainless. This is all steel frame and slide, but parkerized. That said, Auto Ordnance has multiple other versions you might like.

User avatar
hkguy
Posts: 615
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2014 9:51 pm

Re: Most Reliable "GI"-type 1911s

Postby hkguy » Wed Dec 21, 2016 12:06 pm

anything from the Philippians, Springfield, Colt, para, etc. but your options will be limited if your looking for a stainless gun.
NRA Member and Certified NRA RSO
IDPA & USPSA Member
Michigan Gun Owner Member

User avatar
Hand and Steel
Posts: 711
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2015 2:44 am
Location: In the world but not of it

Re: Most Reliable "GI"-type 1911s

Postby Hand and Steel » Wed Dec 21, 2016 2:49 pm

MisterB wrote:I have an Auto Ordnance WWII parkerized mil spec 1911 that I'm quite happy with.
I've heard that Auto Ordnance 1911s can have difficulty with hollow points. What is your experience with this?

Also, anyone know what the current word on Springfield's titanium firing pins is? Of course a firing pin takes about 10 seconds to replace on a 1911, but I'd like to know ahead of time if I go the Springfield route.
"Our great war is a spiritual war, our great depression is our lives."

MisterB
Posts: 437
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2014 7:54 pm

Re: Most Reliable "GI"-type 1911s

Postby MisterB » Thu Dec 22, 2016 7:29 am

Hand and Steel wrote:
MisterB wrote:I have an Auto Ordnance WWII parkerized mil spec 1911 that I'm quite happy with.
I've heard that Auto Ordnance 1911s can have difficulty with hollow points. What is your experience with this?

Also, anyone know what the current word on Springfield's titanium firing pins is? Of course a firing pin takes about 10 seconds to replace on a 1911, but I'd like to know ahead of time if I go the Springfield route.


Yes, that's correct, but I'm fine with that- seeing as they are attempting to stick very close to the WWII 1911-A1 that was designed for FMJ before hollow point was even a thing. I haven't tried hollow point in this gun, but the manual says not to. I'm not sure if this is the case with other true to original 1911's or not

User avatar
Nathan
Site Admin
Posts: 1940
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2014 8:51 pm
Location: Billings, MT
Contact:

Re: Most Reliable "GI"-type 1911s

Postby Nathan » Thu Dec 22, 2016 7:50 am

The beauty in .45 is that hollow points aren't required, anyway. Other bullets hope to one day grow up to become a .45 when they expand. In +P loadings the hollow point makes the .45 even better, but I wouldn't feel in any way under-gunned carrying .45 FMJ, either.
Nathan in Image

NRA Certified Instructor in Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun, Personal Protection Inside the Home and Personal Protection Outside the Home.
Image

User avatar
Hand and Steel
Posts: 711
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2015 2:44 am
Location: In the world but not of it

Re: Most Reliable "GI"-type 1911s

Postby Hand and Steel » Thu Dec 22, 2016 1:26 pm

I used to carry my 1911 loaded with FMJ on a daily basis and never felt uneasy about it. I occasionally still do when out in the woods. My main interest in hollow points for a .45 lies in limiting the potential for over penetration.
"Our great war is a spiritual war, our great depression is our lives."

User avatar
Nathan
Site Admin
Posts: 1940
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2014 8:51 pm
Location: Billings, MT
Contact:

Re: Most Reliable "GI"-type 1911s

Postby Nathan » Thu Dec 22, 2016 4:49 pm

Hand and Steel wrote:My main interest in hollow points for a .45 lies in limiting the potential for over penetration.

Write this in the Bible; a .45 caliber slug will never over-penetrate anywhere near ACP velocities. If you could push it beyond 1200 fps it might be a plausible possibility, but certainly not in 850-950 range. If you're going to push a 230 grain slug out > 1000 fps, do it in an HK.
Nathan in Image

NRA Certified Instructor in Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun, Personal Protection Inside the Home and Personal Protection Outside the Home.
Image

User avatar
Hand and Steel
Posts: 711
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2015 2:44 am
Location: In the world but not of it

Re: Most Reliable "GI"-type 1911s

Postby Hand and Steel » Thu Dec 22, 2016 6:12 pm

I've found more than one account of .45 ACP FMJ rounds going clean through people. Would you want to test it with people behind the target?
"Our great war is a spiritual war, our great depression is our lives."

User avatar
Nathan
Site Admin
Posts: 1940
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2014 8:51 pm
Location: Billings, MT
Contact:

Re: Most Reliable "GI"-type 1911s

Postby Nathan » Thu Dec 22, 2016 6:31 pm

I've never heard of .45 ACP penetrating >100%. If anything, I've always found it to be perfect. Perhaps saying it can't happen was a bit too much, but in my experience and testing I've found no greater consistent caliber than the .45 ACP @ 230 grains. Be it ball or JHP, it always penetrates right into the sweet spot. Not too much, not too little...just right.
Nathan in Image

NRA Certified Instructor in Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun, Personal Protection Inside the Home and Personal Protection Outside the Home.
Image

User avatar
Hand and Steel
Posts: 711
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2015 2:44 am
Location: In the world but not of it

Re: Most Reliable "GI"-type 1911s

Postby Hand and Steel » Fri Dec 23, 2016 10:04 am

One instance that leaps immediately to mind was described in "Shooting to Live" and involved a man being shot six times with a 1911 loaded with FMJ at a distance of between 10 and 3 feet. Only two of the rounds stayed in the body, with four passing clean through. A two out of three over-penetration rate in that instance is not reassuring from the perspective of not accidentally shooting someone directly behind the target. I trust the .45 hardball to do its job, but if reliability is assured with good quality 230 grain hollow points, I would generally prefer the expanding round as insurance against a pass through, and take whatever additional effectiveness it has as a bonus.
"Our great war is a spiritual war, our great depression is our lives."

User avatar
Nathan
Site Admin
Posts: 1940
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2014 8:51 pm
Location: Billings, MT
Contact:

Re: Most Reliable "GI"-type 1911s

Postby Nathan » Fri Dec 23, 2016 7:53 pm

Hand and Steel wrote:One instance that leaps immediately to mind was described in "Shooting to Live" and involved a man being shot six times with a 1911 loaded with FMJ at a distance of between 10 and 3 feet. Only two of the rounds stayed in the body, with four passing clean through. A two out of three over-penetration rate in that instance is not reassuring from the perspective of not accidentally shooting someone directly behind the target

Be aware this contradicts every conclusion I've reached in thousands of rounds of testing. I'm not saying that it didn't happen; I don't know the specifics (was the guy a half-starved tweaker who weighed 95 pounds and was about 6" thick? Were they shots in the arm/leg/butt/etc. that passed through?). I only know statistical analysis of data gathered through my own first hand testing. In keeping with something I stated in CarryGuide.com:
"You will hear of threats dropping immediately from a .25 ACP and you will hear of threats that continued to fight despite a solid .44 Magnum hit but these are rare exceptions and should never be considered representative in any way of overall stopping power potential. They are nothing beyond extremely rare incidents that have minimal impact on the overall averages used to calculate overall stopping power potential."
I'm mentioning this to demonstrate an acknowledgement dismissal of rare incidents that statistically do not affect probability of ballistic properties. You can find rare examples to substantiate any position you want to take if you are willing to accept rare examples as conclusive. I'm not going to tell you that you are wrong; I'm simply stating that my own testing is conclusive enough for me to state that over-penetration from a .45 ACP is extremely rare, even statistically impossible, for an average size/density male shot center mass. As always, YMMV.
Nathan in Image

NRA Certified Instructor in Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun, Personal Protection Inside the Home and Personal Protection Outside the Home.
Image

User avatar
Tye
Posts: 104
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2014 11:15 am

Re: Most Reliable "GI"-type 1911s

Postby Tye » Fri Mar 10, 2017 3:53 pm

So, with hollow points are you going to take that shot with somerone right behind the bad guy?
Best regards,

Tye

User avatar
Nathan
Site Admin
Posts: 1940
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2014 8:51 pm
Location: Billings, MT
Contact:

Re: Most Reliable "GI"-type 1911s

Postby Nathan » Fri Mar 10, 2017 4:17 pm

Tye wrote:So, with hollow points are you going to take that shot with somerone right behind the bad guy?

If he is considered a lethal threat? Absolutely.
Nathan in Image

NRA Certified Instructor in Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun, Personal Protection Inside the Home and Personal Protection Outside the Home.
Image


Return to “1911 Talk”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest