Cold chicken brawl

[Ohio9]

And continually reducing race to just "skin color" is like defending pit bulls by saying, "but their coat color doesn't make them the most dangerous dog breed!"

And you think dogs can be aptly compared to humans?

[BePrepared]

And continually reducing race to just "skin color" is like defending pit bulls by saying, "but their coat color doesn't make them the most dangerous dog breed!"

And you think dogs can be aptly compared to humans?

[Ohio9]

The point is that the difference between types of dogs is not on par between different races of humans.

[BePrepared]

Any white guys beat their pregnant girlfriends who are on crutches this week?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... posed.html

[BePrepared]

Any white doctors go on a mass shooting spree today?

http://heavy.com/news/2017/06/henry-bel ... dr-photos/

[BePrepared]

Any black grandparents beaten by a mob of 50 white kids this week? This month? This year? This decade? EVER?

[BePrepared]

Any 92 year old black women robbed and dragged across the ground by white dudes this week?

[Ohio9]

If I looked hard enough I'm sure I could find white people doing all those things, or at least something comparable to them. Maybe not this week. but does that really matter?

Dylan Roof executed 9 people in a church.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dylann_Roof

Timothy McVeigh killed more then 160 with a bomb.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_McVeigh

Anders Breivik killed 77 people, the majority of them children

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anders_Behring_Breivik

Jeremy Christian stabbed two people to death because they stood up to him after he insulted some women he had never met.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/27/us/p ... -rant.html


There are countless examples of people of all races committing atrocities. Your individual cases prove nothing. There is nothing about being black that makes someone criminal. There is no criminal gene or criminal race.

[BePrepared]

[BePrepared]

Two black mass shootings in two days. White folks got some catching up to do!

[Ohio9]

Two black mass shootings in two days. White folks got some catching up to do!

Seeing as we've already established 64% of mass shootings are committed by whites, I'd say we're all caught up already.

[BePrepared]

Seeing as we've already established 64% of mass shootings are committed by whites, I'd say we're all caught up already.

Nope! Not at all. Because that number is complete and total BULLSHIT, and here's why:

The original source of that number is Mother Jones magazine, and here's how they determined what a "mass shooting" is:

The interactive map below and our downloadable database have been expanded with 28 additional cases from 2013-2017. Dating from 2005, the FBI and leading criminologists essentially defined a mass shooting as an attack in a public place in which four or more victims were killed. We adopted that baseline when we gathered data in 2012 on three decades worth of cases. (It bears noting that there have been many similar indiscriminate gun rampages with fewer fatalities that would otherwise be included in our dataset.) In January 2013, a mandate for federal investigation of mass shootings authorized by President Barack Obama lowered that baseline to three or more victims. Accordingly, we include attacks dating from January 2013 in which three or more victims died. Our original analysis, which covers cases with four or more victims killed from 1982-2012, follows below. The cases we have documented since then using the revised federal baseline reaffirm our major findings.


http://www.motherjones.com/politics/201 ... tings-map/

So, depending on the year, either 3 or 4 people must DIE before they count it as a "mass shooting." Well, that's ludicrous! Three to four people being killed is a good defintion of a mass murder, but not a mass shooting. Shootings don't always result in death.

SO, these two most recent MASS SHOOTINGS wouldn't be counted under this meathodology. The black doctor in NYC shot SEVEN people, but only one died. What rational, reasonable person wouldn't call that a mass shooting?

In Little Rock, TWENTY FIVE PEOPLE were shot and injured by a black gunman or gunmen. TWENTY FIVE FUCKING PEOPLE SHOT! But according to Mother Jones, this isn't a mass shooting. No one died, so this doesn't count.

So, this just a stupid, preposterous method of counting "mass shootings" is the USA. And of course, it gives us a very inaccurate picture of both the number of mass shootings, and who is committing them. The data doesn't apparently doesn't exist to prove this assertion, but I'm will to bet that if it did, it would show that in true MASS SHOOTINGS, where 3 or 4 people are shot and wounded, the number of mass shootings committed by blacks exceeds the number committed by whites, even though the white population far exceeds that of blacks.

[BePrepared]

Oh, and by the way, the fact that you didn't challenge these two most recent incidents as being mass shootings, shows that you know that they were, in fact, true mass shootings. ;-)

[BePrepared]

I'm watching this video about black mass shootings:




...and good old Colin mentions this New York Times article:

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/05/23/u ... lence.html


Now, usually we're told by the media (and Ohio9) that mass shootings are a white thing. But then along comes the NY Times telling us that it's a black thing, and that America doesn't care, because it's just blacks killing blacks.

LOL! So which is it, Ohio?

I think the evidence and facts are pretty clear.

[Ohio9]

I didn't say they were a black thing or a white thing, I simply pointed out that whites commit the majority of them.